The year 2025 should be a celebration of the United Nations' 80th anniversary. Instead, it may be remembered as the moment the post-1945 global order disintegrated.
Signs of strain have been evident for years. Military interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, alongside the war in Ukraine, have normalized the use of unlawful force by some permanent Security Council members. Inaction in the face of atrocities has betrayed fundamental human principles. Ongoing divisions have reignited violence in the Middle East, with the recent strike on Iran as the latest development.
The dominance of power politics also undermines global trade. Broad tariffs distort supply chains, driving inflation and economic stagnation. The World Trade Organization has grown ineffective, and the goals of the Doha round are now forgotten.
The 2008 financial crisis revealed the shortcomings of neoliberal policies, yet austerity measures persisted. Prioritizing large corporations and the wealthy over ordinary citizens has worsened inequality. A report from Oxfam highlights that the $33.9tn amassed by the top 1% in the past decade could have ended global poverty 22 times over.
Diminished state capabilities have fueled public distrust in governance, creating an opening for extremist movements that exploit divisions and undermine democracy.
Despite the 2030 deadline for sustainable development targets, many nations have reduced cooperative efforts. Resources remain inadequate, costs prohibitive, and bureaucratic hurdles limit access, often disregarding regional circumstances.
This is not merely about aid but rectifying centuries of exploitation and oppression in Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia. In a world with a GDP exceeding $100tn, over 700 million people still endure hunger and lack basic necessities.
Wealthier nations, historically the largest carbon emitters, evade responsibility while the poorest face the worst climate impacts. Last year was the hottest on record, outpacing the Paris Agreement's goals. The mandatory terms of Kyoto shifted to voluntary pledges, and the $100bn yearly climate financing promised in 2009 never arrived. Meanwhile, rising military budgets make meaningful action even less likely.
Criticism of global institutions overlooks their tangible contributions.
Read next
"UK correct to reject Trump's cryptocurrency agenda, says Guardian editorial"
Excessive enthusiasm often shapes decisions about market regulation. It was encouraging to hear Sir Andrew Bailey, the Bank of England governor, push back against the growing support for cryptocurrencies. In his July address at Mansion House, he restated his doubts about the necessity of a central bank digital currency like
"Politics fails to represent public opinion as Gaza crisis reveals deepening divide"
had the right to defend itself, but what followed has been a devastating humanitarian crisis that has shocked global observers. The recent shift in tone from UK politicians reflects growing unease over the scale of suffering in Gaza, even as diplomatic efforts stall.
The issue erupted unexpectedly during a BBC
Tech advances solve old issues but breed new challenges.
Today, strong advocates of technology dominate the ranks of influential Silicon Valley figures. They envision a promising future for humanity driven by rapid advancements in innovation.
Undeniably, technology and science are among humanity’s greatest strengths and sources of hope. However, this optimism often goes too far, as technological progress