"Does the Club World Cup benefit football's schedule?"

There are many reasons to criticize the Club World Cup. Players are already stretched thin by their schedules; the expansion to 32 teams appears motivated by financial interests; matches have been played in extreme heat that makes the game difficult; stadiums have frequently been far from full; and the event has provided a platform for figures like Donald Trump and Gianni Infantino to indulge their self-importance.

Yet there is merit in a tournament that unites teams and supporters from around the world every four years. Fans, particularly those from Brazil, have brought energy to the event. Underdogs have also made their mark: Flamengo surprised Chelsea, Botafogo defeated PSG, and Al-Hilal eliminated Manchester City. The competition has delivered memorable matches, goals, and performances, including PSG’s dominant display against Real Madrid in the semi-finals.

English fans have been doubtful about the tournament, though this is hardly surprising. England chose not to participate in the first three World Cups—as well as the inaugural European Cup—believing it might distract from domestic priorities. As time passes, will they embrace the Club World Cup, or will it remain an unwelcome addition to an already packed schedule?