The UK’s intention to recognize a Palestinian state aligns with international law, according to a government official, following concerns from a group of lawmakers that the move might not meet legal standards.
Gareth Thomas, a minister, stated that acknowledging Palestine was a “political decision” and that the government considered it consistent with the Montevideo convention’s criteria for statehood, established in 1933.
In a notable policy shift, the prime minister announced this week that recognition would occur before the UN general assembly in September unless Israel agreed to conditions outlined in the UK-supported peace plan, endorsed by several nations.
These conditions include meaningful measures to de-escalate the conflict in Gaza, a ceasefire, a halt to further expansion in the West Bank, and a commitment to long-term negotiations.
However, 40 members of the House of Lords, including prominent legal experts, sent a letter to the attorney general contesting the decision. They argued that recognizing Palestine might violate international law, citing uncertainties over its defined borders, stable governance, and ability to engage in diplomatic relations.
When asked if the move complied with international law, Thomas responded: “We believe it does. Recognition of a state is ultimately a political choice, and over 140 countries have already recognized Palestine. We are prepared to do so in September if Israel does not cease hostilities, commit to a truce, and pursue a two-state solution without further expansion in the West Bank.”
In their letter, the peers noted the lack of agreement on Palestine’s borders and the absence of a unified government due to divisions between Hamas and Fatah.
Thomas maintained that Palestine has a “clear population” and that recognition would be based on the 1967 borders.
The letter also stated: “Selective interpretation of international law risks undermining it, and legal criteria for state recognition should not be altered for political convenience. We urge clarity on why recognizing Palestine would not conflict with these principles.”
Signatories included legal figures such as David Pannick, who previously represented the government in key court cases, alongside experts Guglielmo Verdirame and Edward Faulks.
Read next
"Softball booms in Brazilian city as Cuban migrants surpass Venezuelans for the first time"
Roberto Hernández Tello, 59, originally from Camagüey, Cuba, had hoped to reach the United States for a better future. But due to stricter immigration policies under the previous U.S. administration, he found himself in Curitiba, southern Brazil, thousands of miles from home.
Like him, many Cubans have recently arrived
"Public asked to aid in catching drug gangs using 'mother ships' near UK shores"
Police Ask Coastal Residents to Aid in Combating Drug Smuggling
Authorities have called on residents of coastal areas in the UK to assist in disrupting criminal groups that are employing increasingly creative tactics to bring large amounts of cocaine into the country.
Officials have noted a rise in “at-sea drop-offs”
"Germany's historic largest gay nightclub files for bankruptcy"
Germany’s longest-running and largest LGBTQ+ dance venue has filed for bankruptcy after operating for nearly 50 years, succumbing to financial pressures and shifting trends in Berlin’s nightlife.
Internal challenges and the rise of dating apps contributed to SchwuZ’s difficulties over the past year. In May, the venue