OpenAI chief Sam Altman told staff on Tuesday that the firm does not dictate how the Pentagon employs its artificial‑intelligence tools in combat settings. His statement about OpenAI’s lack of influence arrives as lawmakers and ethicists intensify scrutiny of military AI use and as engineers voice worries about the fate of their creations.
“You don’t get to make operational choices,” Altman said to employees, according to Bloomberg and CNBC.
“So whether you think the Iran strike was justified or the Venezuela operation was wrong, you’re not asked to weigh in,” he added.
The sector has been caught in fierce debate and strained talks in recent weeks after the Defense Department pressed AI firms to lift safety constraints on their models to broaden possible military uses. Sources say AI‑driven systems have already been deployed in the U.S. effort to detain Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and in targeting decisions during the conflict with Iran.
Anthropic, a competitor that builds the Claude chatbot, turned down a Pentagon contract last week, citing fears that its model could be repurposed for domestic mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth labeled the company a “supply‑chain risk,” a designation never before applied to a U.S. firm and one that could inflict serious financial damage if formalized.
On the same day Hegseth announced punitive steps against Anthropic, the Pentagon revealed a separate agreement with OpenAI that appeared intended to substitute Claude in military projects. The timing of that pact and the perception that OpenAI had crossed ethical lines rejected by Anthropic sparked criticism both publicly and within OpenAI’s workforce.
Altman and OpenAI have since stressed that their technology will be used lawfully and have sought to manage the fallout, with Altman conceding that the agreement was hurried and made the company appear “opportunistic and sloppy.”
Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei denounced Altman as “mendacious” in a memo to staff on Wednesday and accused him of offering “dictator‑style praise to Trump,” according to The Information. “We have kept our red lines intact rather than colluding to stage ‘safety theater’ for the benefit of employees—something everyone at the Pentagon, Palantir, our political advisers, and others assumed we were trying to solve,” Amodei wrote.
He also targeted the Pentagon and the Trump administration. “The real reason the Pentagon and the Trump team dislike us is that we haven’t donated to Trump, whereas OpenAI and Greg have given heavily,” he added, referencing Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, who contributed $25 million to a pro‑Trump political action committee with his wife.
Read next
Brusselslaunches probe into Snapchat over child safety worries
Brussels has launched an inquiry into Snapchat after worries that the messaging service is exposing children to grooming, sexual abuse and other illegal activity.
In a separate ruling on Thursday, the European Commission also stated that four pornographic sites are not stopping minors from viewing adult material.
The probes targeting
Senior European reporter suspended for using AI‑generated quotations
The owner of the Dutch daily De Telegraaf and the Irish Independent has placed a senior reporter on leave for now after he confessed to employing artificial intelligence to “incorrectly attribute statements to individuals.”
Peter Vandermeersch, who previously led Mediahuis’s Irish division, said he “succumbed to hallucinations” – the label
Fire specialists stay alert as lithium‑ion battery risks rise
Lithium‑ion cells now pose a fresh technological risk, a fire‑science specialist admits keeps him restless at night, while fire‑service leaders caution that the proliferation of these cells in daily items is outstripping public awareness and safety rules.
The inferno that ravaged a historic Glasgow structure and forced