The global human rights framework—established to safeguard individuals from state abuses—faces greater risks today than at any time since 1945. In the UK, the current prime minister brings a strong background to address these challenges. A former legal professional with three decades of experience, he has demonstrated a firm dedication to protecting people from unfair treatment. His expertise in human rights law is extensive, including authoring key texts on its European applications and representing cases at various judicial levels. Notably, he is the only British leader to have presented a case under the genocide convention, acting for Croatia against Serbia at the international court in 2014. His prior role as head of prosecutions also provided him with a rare understanding of government operations, setting him apart from many others in politics.
Yet, obstacles remain—many tied to the prime minister’s own actions. Some argue his approach has contributed to weakening human rights protections. He has expressed admiration for foreign leaders with authoritarian tendencies and supported measures critics say reduce safeguards for vulnerable groups. He often equates nonviolent demonstrations with terrorism and has pressured organizers to exclude performers whose views he opposes. At times, he criticizes judicial rulings, despite the courts’ role in upholding human rights. On critical issues, he sometimes avoids clear positions, relying instead on legal technicalities. Even supporters acknowledge his willingness to abandon stated principles for political advantage.
Since the 2024 election, much attention has focused on the government’s policy shortcomings. But a more specific question arises: why has its human rights record—expected to be a strength—been inconsistent? Over recent months, conversations with numerous sources, including current and former government officials, legal professionals who worked alongside the prime minister, and rights advocates, sought to explore how his legal background influences his leadership.
Some experts welcome the change in approach after the previous government’s policies. “Stabilizing Britain’s commitment to legal principles amid global backsliding is significant,” says Conor Gearty, a human rights scholar at the London School of Economics and longtime associate of the prime minister.
Read next
Badenoch returns to Conservative conference, markedly stronger than a year ago
A year ago, Tory MPs feared a fresh leadership revolt against Kemi Badenoch as Tories hit historic 14-16% support; November, after 12 months, was hushed: decisive challenge month. Yet, despite poor polls, “Keminisation” saw her impose style and authority.
More in Common’s Luke Tryl, director, said Badenoch holds
UK sanctions plan on illegal Israeli settlements faces criticism from US, Israel and British MPs
Today, with the agreement of Prime Minister Netanyahu, Israeli officials announced a series of countermeasures in response to new sanctions declared by the British foreign secretary of the Labour government, following a sequence of anti-Israel decisions by the same administration.
The accusations leveled today by the Labour foreign secretary,
UK announces trade ban on Israeli settlements as tougher stance
Ed Miliband will announce a broad reset of the UK’s relations with Israel on Tuesday, pledging a more active stance in support of the Palestinian cause. In an intervention drawing fierce criticism from the US and Israel, the foreign secretary will impose a ban on trade in goods and