Today, strong advocates of technology dominate the ranks of influential Silicon Valley figures. They envision a promising future for humanity driven by rapid advancements in innovation.
Undeniably, technology and science are among humanity’s greatest strengths and sources of hope. However, this optimism often goes too far, as technological progress invariably introduces new challenges even while solving existing ones—a lesson well-documented by scientific inquiry. Blind faith in technology risks delivering fleeting benefits while imposing long-term consequences. To truly harness technological potential, a more measured and thoughtful approach is essential.
Why does technology frequently create unexpected issues alongside its successes? Anthropologist Sander van der Leeuw proposed an explanation years ago, now resembling a natural principle. When confronting a problem, we develop a simplified model of how the world works, then design a solution based on that understanding. Often, this fixes the immediate issue—but inevitably, the model proves incomplete. What was omitted leads to unintended repercussions once the technology interacts with reality.
This pattern recurs because simplified models are useful yet misleading. Their omissions blind us to full consequences. More efficient fishing methods boost food supply, only to deplete ocean life. Non-stick cookware revolutionizes kitchens, until its hazardous chemicals spread globally. Plastics, prized for convenience, now saturate ecosystems, infiltrating even our bodies. Such outcomes accompany technology’s triumphs.
Recognizing this demands proactive problem-solving within innovation itself. Acknowledging our limitations doesn’t mean rejecting progress but prioritizing foresight and restraint. It means implementing safeguards, allowing corrective measures, and minimizing severe fallout.
Current trends in artificial intelligence (AI) research exemplify a dangerous lack of caution. A few dominant corporations race to dominate the AI landscape, releasing models rapidly with minimal scrutiny. The consequences remain uncertain, yet oversight lags behind deployment. Responsible development requires balancing ambition with accountability—a lesson history underscores but often goes unheeded.
Read next
"UK correct to reject Trump's cryptocurrency agenda, says Guardian editorial"
Excessive enthusiasm often shapes decisions about market regulation. It was encouraging to hear Sir Andrew Bailey, the Bank of England governor, push back against the growing support for cryptocurrencies. In his July address at Mansion House, he restated his doubts about the necessity of a central bank digital currency like
"Politics fails to represent public opinion as Gaza crisis reveals deepening divide"
had the right to defend itself, but what followed has been a devastating humanitarian crisis that has shocked global observers. The recent shift in tone from UK politicians reflects growing unease over the scale of suffering in Gaza, even as diplomatic efforts stall.
The issue erupted unexpectedly during a BBC
"Amid global turmoil, abandoning globalization would be misguided, argues Lula"
The year 2025 should be a celebration of the United Nations' 80th anniversary. Instead, it may be remembered as the moment the post-1945 global order disintegrated.
Signs of strain have been evident for years. Military interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, alongside the war in Ukraine, have normalized the