Zohran Mamdani’s unexpected victory in New York’s mayoral primary reflects the stark divisions in the city—and the nation. On one side, a young progressive candidate overcame the entrenched political establishment, despite its vast resources and influential backers. On the other, a wave of racism and anti-Muslim sentiment erupted, with some portraying his success as an extremist takeover, driven by unfounded fears of radical ideology.
In the aftermath of Mamdani’s win, hostility toward Muslims surged, revealing an unsettling tolerance for bigotry. While little shocks the U.S. these days, the intensity of the backlash exposed deep-seated prejudice.
Political figures, former officials, and social media personalities amplified false narratives, imagining absurd scenarios of ideological domination. Some described his win as a consequence of unchecked immigration, while others hurled degrading insults, questioning his loyalty and demanding his removal from office.
The reaction has been so extreme that even inflammatory rhetoric from polarizing figures appears mild in comparison. Some responses border on parody—yet they are tragically real. The notion that Mamdani, known for his earnest demeanor, is some extremist threat is absurd enough to be laughable—but the persistence of such beliefs reveals a darker reality.
Years later, it remains astonishing how public Muslim figures provoke such irrational fear—and how easily anti-Muslim hatred is dismissed. Prominent leaders in Mamdani’s own party have remained silent, and those spreading falsehoods face no repercussions. When prejudice becomes normalized, its harm goes unchallenged.
The indifference to attacks on Mamdani stems not just from his faith but also from his politics. His real “offense” is not his background but his critique of mainstream economic policies and foreign affairs. His progressive stance—on taxes, housing, and U.S. support for conflict—has made him a target, fueling resistance from those invested in the status quo.
The response to his campaign underscores deeper tensions, revealing both the potential for change and the resistance it provokes.
Read next
"UK correct to reject Trump's cryptocurrency agenda, says Guardian editorial"
Excessive enthusiasm often shapes decisions about market regulation. It was encouraging to hear Sir Andrew Bailey, the Bank of England governor, push back against the growing support for cryptocurrencies. In his July address at Mansion House, he restated his doubts about the necessity of a central bank digital currency like
"Politics fails to represent public opinion as Gaza crisis reveals deepening divide"
had the right to defend itself, but what followed has been a devastating humanitarian crisis that has shocked global observers. The recent shift in tone from UK politicians reflects growing unease over the scale of suffering in Gaza, even as diplomatic efforts stall.
The issue erupted unexpectedly during a BBC
Tech advances solve old issues but breed new challenges.
Today, strong advocates of technology dominate the ranks of influential Silicon Valley figures. They envision a promising future for humanity driven by rapid advancements in innovation.
Undeniably, technology and science are among humanity’s greatest strengths and sources of hope. However, this optimism often goes too far, as technological progress