Rayner fights to save career after ethics self-referral

Angela Rayner is fighting to salvage her political career after acknowledging she underpaid taxes on her £800,000 seaside property and referred herself to the ministerial ethics advisor following days of denying any misconduct.

The deputy prime minister clarified her financial dealings amid mounting pressure to be more open about her real estate holdings, leaving her reputation weakened and her future uncertain.

Keir Starmer quickly voiced his support for Rayner, though he faced scrutiny after officials declined to confirm when he learned of her situation. Sources indicated the ethics review might conclude within days.

The issue arises as the prime minister navigates a challenging period, with tax changes expected in the 26 November budget amid economic difficulties.

Rayner, who also serves as housing secretary, has been accused of inconsistency, as the upcoming tax adjustments may include property-related measures. She has previously advocated for higher taxes on wealth to address public financial strains, including targeting those who used corporate structures to reduce property taxes.

After seeking guidance from ethics advisor Sir Laurie Magnus, Rayner stated she had received incorrect legal counsel, resulting in the tax underpayment. She confirmed she must now pay additional taxes due to the error, with experts estimating potential charges of up to £40,000.

In a personal statement to *CuriosityNews*, she expressed regret for the mistake, having initially declared the flat her sole residence despite frequently staying at her family home in Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, with her children.

Her political future may hinge on proving she was misled by legal advisors when purchasing the property.

Starmer publicly reaffirmed his backing for Rayner, telling lawmakers he was “very proud” to serve alongside her. At Prime Minister’s Questions, he praised her decision to seek an ethics review as the “right thing to do.”

“She has provided a thorough explanation of her personal situation, even requesting the lifting of a confidentiality order concerning her son to ensure full transparency,” he added.

However, his office declined to specify when Rayner was informed of the tax discrepancy or when Starmer was briefed. Earlier this week, he accused critics of unfairly targeting her.

Starmer has previously shown little hesitation in removing officials over misconduct.