The global human rights framework—established to safeguard individuals from state abuses—faces greater risks today than at any time since 1945. In the UK, the current prime minister brings a strong background to address these challenges. A former legal professional with three decades of experience, he has demonstrated a firm dedication to protecting people from unfair treatment. His expertise in human rights law is extensive, including authoring key texts on its European applications and representing cases at various judicial levels. Notably, he is the only British leader to have presented a case under the genocide convention, acting for Croatia against Serbia at the international court in 2014. His prior role as head of prosecutions also provided him with a rare understanding of government operations, setting him apart from many others in politics.
Yet, obstacles remain—many tied to the prime minister’s own actions. Some argue his approach has contributed to weakening human rights protections. He has expressed admiration for foreign leaders with authoritarian tendencies and supported measures critics say reduce safeguards for vulnerable groups. He often equates nonviolent demonstrations with terrorism and has pressured organizers to exclude performers whose views he opposes. At times, he criticizes judicial rulings, despite the courts’ role in upholding human rights. On critical issues, he sometimes avoids clear positions, relying instead on legal technicalities. Even supporters acknowledge his willingness to abandon stated principles for political advantage.
Since the 2024 election, much attention has focused on the government’s policy shortcomings. But a more specific question arises: why has its human rights record—expected to be a strength—been inconsistent? Over recent months, conversations with numerous sources, including current and former government officials, legal professionals who worked alongside the prime minister, and rights advocates, sought to explore how his legal background influences his leadership.
Some experts welcome the change in approach after the previous government’s policies. “Stabilizing Britain’s commitment to legal principles amid global backsliding is significant,” says Conor Gearty, a human rights scholar at the London School of Economics and longtime associate of the prime minister.
Read next
"Democrats blame Trump tariffs for job losses, rising prices, and market decline – live updates"
'Costing Jobs and Raising Prices': Democrats Criticize Trump Over Tariffs and Weak Employment Data
Democratic leaders have condemned former President Trump’s tariff policies and federal budget reductions after a disappointing jobs report showed 258,000 fewer jobs were added in May and June than initially estimated.
Senate
UK immigration rhetoric fueled backlash against antiracism, study finds
Study Finds "Hostile Language" in Media and Parliament Often Targets People of Colour
A pattern of “hostile language” in news reports and UK parliamentary debates is more likely to describe people of colour as immigrants or with less sympathy, researchers have found.
The Runnymede Trust, a race equality
"Lammy and Vance bond over tough upbringings and Diet Coke"
David Lammy Reflects on Friendship with US Vice-President and Personal Struggles
David Lammy has spoken about his friendship with US Vice-President JD Vance, noting they share a bond over their challenging upbringings.
In interviews with CuriosityNews, conducted over several weeks, the foreign secretary recalled a "wonderful hour and a