Columbia's Agreement with Federal Government Sparks Divided Reactions
A recent agreement between Columbia University and federal officials after lengthy negotiations has drawn mixed responses from faculty, students, and alumni—highlighting ongoing divisions on campus since the start of the conflict in Gaza.
David Pozen, a professor at Columbia Law School, criticized the deal, calling it a way to give "legal form to an extortion scheme."
"The methods used to enforce these changes are as unprecedented as they are flawed. U.S. higher education policy is now being shaped through irregular agreements, a process that undermines both the university's role as a space for independent thought and the integrity of legal governance," Pozen added.
Others at Columbia viewed the settlement more favorably. The Stand Columbia Society, a coalition of alumni, students, and faculty, endorsed the decision, noting that they had long supported reforms aligned with the government's demands.
"The Stand Columbia Society sees this agreement as a positive resolution that secures research funding, advances necessary changes, and upholds academic independence," they stated. "We have remained firm in advocating for what is right, and today, both the university and government officials should be acknowledged for reaching this outcome."
The federal government's broader effort to impose financial penalties on universities follows its recent agreement with Columbia. According to sources, this deal is seen as setting expectations for future negotiations with other institutions.
Under the terms of the settlement, Columbia will pay $200 million to the government over three years, along with an additional $21 million to resolve related investigations.
"This agreement represents progress after a challenging period of federal review and uncertainty," said Claire Shipman, the university's interim president.
Funding was initially withheld over allegations that Columbia did not adequately address reports of antisemitism on campus following the outbreak of the war in 2023.
Federal officials are now reportedly pursuing similar actions against other universities, including Harvard, accusing them of failing to combat antisemitism on campus as a condition for restoring federal funding.
Read next
"Democrats blame Trump tariffs for job losses, rising prices, and market decline – live updates"
'Costing Jobs and Raising Prices': Democrats Criticize Trump Over Tariffs and Weak Employment Data
Democratic leaders have condemned former President Trump’s tariff policies and federal budget reductions after a disappointing jobs report showed 258,000 fewer jobs were added in May and June than initially estimated.
Senate
UK immigration rhetoric fueled backlash against antiracism, study finds
Study Finds "Hostile Language" in Media and Parliament Often Targets People of Colour
A pattern of “hostile language” in news reports and UK parliamentary debates is more likely to describe people of colour as immigrants or with less sympathy, researchers have found.
The Runnymede Trust, a race equality
"Lammy and Vance bond over tough upbringings and Diet Coke"
David Lammy Reflects on Friendship with US Vice-President and Personal Struggles
David Lammy has spoken about his friendship with US Vice-President JD Vance, noting they share a bond over their challenging upbringings.
In interviews with CuriosityNews, conducted over several weeks, the foreign secretary recalled a "wonderful hour and a