Donald Trump’s strike on Iran and the lethal war it has sparked is stark and without precedent – yet its economic fallout follows a familiar pattern: another surge in prices is imminent.
From the pandemic‑induced shutdown and later reopening to Russian forces advancing into Ukraine, the world economy has been jolted by successive cost spikes.
At the same time, the climate emergency adds further instability to the prices of goods whose output is exposed to extreme weather – such as coffee, cocoa and olive oil.
Initial market reaction to Trump’s “Operation Epic Fury” was relatively muted. By Friday, however, with the strategic Strait of Hormuz effectively shut and reports of output cuts in Kuwait, the pressure mounted, lifting oil to about $90 (£67) a barrel.
Oil price spikes are especially damaging because the commodity is used far beyond fuel, notably in fertiliser, creating ripple effects for manufacturing and transport.
The poorest households feel the brunt. A study by economists at the University of Massachusetts Amherst identified energy, together with food and agricultural products, as commodities that “have a disproportionate capacity to widen inequality when their prices rise.”
Where gains occur, they are narrowly distributed. Another recent analysis found that after the 2022 U.S. oil price jump, half of the extra profit in the sector accrued to the richest 1 % of individuals via equity markets, while the bottom half of the population captured only 1 %.
As lead author Gregor Semieniuk observes: “While everyone bears the inflationary burden of an energy price crisis, the very prices that generate this inflation also deliver outsized profits to a small minority of wealthy shareholders.”
In the United Kingdom – unlike the United States, a net oil importer, where higher prices are unequivocally adverse – the Middle‑East conflict has already added 3 p to a litre of unleaded petrol, according to the RAC.
Should the rise in gas prices prove persistent, household energy bills could climb sharply when the next quarterly price cap is applied in July, just as the Labour Party is outlining measures to ease household expenses. Ministers are already weighing options to shield consumers.
The episode underscores how increasingly untenable it is to leave the task of curbing economy‑wide inflation solely to central banks while expecting markets to resolve the remainder in such a turbulent environment.
Even former Prime Minister Liz Truss implicitly acknowledged this when she introduced the energy price cap in 2022 – a surprisingly interventionist step for a declared free‑market advocate.
Whether or not the state steps in to restrain utility costs, a fresh oil shock poses a serious challenge for monetary policymakers everywhere, particularly in the UK.
In principle, central banks can “look through” supply‑side disturbances such as soaring energy prices, which tend to feed inflation.
Read next
Abuse survivors of Mohamed Al Fayed demand investigation into human trafficking
Survivors of abuse by former Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed are demanding a comprehensive investigation into human trafficking, asserting that such an inquiry is necessary to uncover the full extent of the billionaire’s alleged network.
The collective No One Above (NOA), established by victims of Fayed, is urging the
Climate activists criticize Shell for profiting from Iran conflict windfall
Shell announced stronger‑than‑anticipated earnings of $6.9 billion (£5 billion) after its oil‑trading arm profited from surging energy prices amid the Iran conflict, drawing criticism from climate activists.
Rising oil and gas prices during the Middle East turmoil enabled Europe’s largest oil and gas producer to
Jet Fuel Shortage Could Ground Travel, Reshape Vacations and History
What would happen to flights if the world exhausted its oil supply? Clearly, they would be grounded. More pointedly, could airlines simply run out of aviation fuel if the Iran conflict persists and the Strait of Hormuz stays closed?
This question has never arisen before. Air travel has faced unexpected