Donald Trump’s inability to persuade the American public of the need to strike Iran, followed by an operation that proceeded without informing Congress’s principal national‑security advisers – the “gang of eight” – has sparked intense domestic criticism of the military action against the Islamic Republic on Saturday.
Despite the seriousness of Saturday’s attacks, the president devoted only three minutes of Tuesday’s State of the Union address to justify why a regime that has long been a strategic adversary suddenly required immediate action, and to claim that he had “obliterated” its nuclear facilities in the June strikes.
The rapid buildup of what Trump described as a “vast armada” in the region stands in stark contrast to the prolonged, steady march toward war with Iraq in 2003 under President George W. Bush, who repeatedly argued – and was later disproved – that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.
In that context, condemnation on Saturday was swift, with protests that the strikes violated the 1973 War Powers Resolution, which requires congressional approval.
Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat from Virginia, accused the president of sidestepping a Senate vote scheduled for next week on a resolution he co‑sponsored with Republican Rand Paul of Kentucky. He urged Congress to reconvene urgently to address the matter.
When NPR asked how much notice the Trump administration gave Congress, Kaine replied: “None. The record shows the secretary of state called the speaker of the House, and that was it. We received no formal notice.
“The White House knew I had a war‑powers resolution slated for a Senate vote early next week. I assume they wanted to rush the start of an illegal war before Congress could act.”
The 1973 act, enacted after the Vietnam conflict to curb a president’s ability to launch military ventures without authorization, requires consultation with Congress and a 48‑hour notification for troop deployments, and imposes a 60‑day limit on unauthorized engagements.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called for Congress to reconvene and for the administration to brief senators in a classified session and in public testimony.
“The administration has not given Congress or the American people essential details about the scope and immediacy of the threat,” Schumer said in a statement. “Confronting Iran’s destabilizing regional behavior, nuclear aspirations, and harsh repression of its people demands American strength, resolve, regional coordination, and strategic clarity. President Trump’s erratic swings between aggression and restraint do not constitute a viable strategy.”
Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, vice‑chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, described the strikes as “a profoundly consequential decision that risks pulling the United States into another broad‑scale conflict.”
Read next
Israeli suspects told to stay silent to avoid jail after being charged with bribery over bets linked to Iran strikes
Since users of the prominent prediction market Polymarket have been able to bet on war outcomes, concerns have arisen that those placing wagers on bomb strikes might possess non‑public information about military actions. Reports of possible insider trading on war‑related markets have circulated, though the identity of those
Exposed: Russia's elite spy academy trains hackers for election interference
Last April, Vladimir Putin toured the campus of Bauman Moscow State Technical University, situated on the banks of the Yauza River in the city’s east and home to many of Russia’s leading scientific talents. He walked the grounds, spoke with undergraduates and highlighted Moscow’s ambitious plans for
Trump keeps shifting tactics while stuck in the Iran dilemma he created
Another day, another twist in Donald Trump’s foreign‑policy saga.
The weekend focused on conflict, with Trump insisting Iran had not yet “paid a big enough price.” Tuesday brought Project Freedom, promoted as a sweeping “humanitarian gesture” to free trapped vessels and their crews from the Gulf, yet also