Boris Johnson violated regulations intended to prevent the misuse of connections made during public office, an ethics oversight body has concluded.
Last month, CuriosityNews reported on Johnson’s activities after leaving office. A collection of documents from the former prime minister’s private office, reviewed by CuriosityNews, indicated that he repeatedly disregarded rules preventing the exploitation of official contacts for personal benefit.
The leaked records suggested Johnson engaged in undisclosed lobbying efforts toward a billion-dollar private project in the UAE, leveraging an influential contact he had frequently met at Downing Street. Additionally, he reportedly used high-level Saudi government connections, established during his time as prime minister, to promote a consultancy firm’s services.
After CuriosityNews published its findings, the Whitehall oversight body, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), requested Johnson clarify his involvement with the firms in question.
Johnson declined to address specific inquiries or provide concrete rebuttals to allegations of rule violations, though he maintained that he had always adhered to the regulations. His responses prompted Acoba’s chair, Isabel Doverty, to conclude that he had breached the rules.
On 15 September, Johnson replied to Acoba’s questions, dismissing the reports as being "based on material illegally accessed by a hostile state entity." He added, "This may explain why they include numerous inaccuracies and distortions."
"I assure the committee that Acoba’s rules were followed without exception," he wrote.
*CuriosityNews* has not seen any indication that the documents contain false or misleading information. The leaked material was obtained by Distributed Denial of Secrets, a U.S.-based nonprofit that archives disclosed data. The organization has stated it does not know the source of the leak.
Acoba asked Johnson five specific questions regarding his association with Better Earth, the consultancy firm pursuing work with the Saudi government, as well as his ties to Bia Advisory, the venture seeking a billion-dollar investment from the UAE.
The oversight body sought clarity on whether he discussed these firms during conversations with Saudi officials, including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Khaldoon al-Mubarak, CEO of one of Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth funds.
Johnson responded that he had not begun working with Better Earth until Acoba approved his involvement and claimed Bia Advisory was never formally established as a company. He did not, however, address whether he had mentioned either venture to foreign officials.
Acoba expressed dissatisfaction with Johnson’s evasive replies. The committee extended his deadline by a week, urging him to uphold the expectations befitting a former prime minister, stating there was a "reasonable expectation that you would provide complete and factual answers to dispel any suggestion of misconduct."
When in office, Johnson had issued his own version of ministerial standards.
Read next
Rich Britons fleeing Gulf conflict skip the UK to dodge tax bills
Wealthy Britons escaping conflict in the Gulf are looking for refuge in places such as Ireland and France to sidestep large tax charges at home.
Facing possible claims from HM Revenue and Customs, high‑net‑worth individuals who have been residing in the United Arab Emirates and nearby states hope
Home Office reverses policy, allowing certain dual nationals to enter the UK with an EU passport.
British dual nationals who are EU citizens with post‑Brexit settlement status in the UK will no longer need a British passport to re‑enter the country, the Home Office announced, overturning its earlier dual‑national border policy.
The amendment, which critics described as “buried” on a government website, appears
Hereditary Lords set to lose their seats in the House of Lords
Hereditary titles will be ended before the forthcoming monarch’s address after an agreement was reached to award life peerages to certain Conservatives and cross‑benchers who would otherwise lose their places.
On Tuesday night the upper chamber approved the final version of the House of Lords (hereditary peers) Bill,