Google Permitted to Retain Chrome Browser Under New Court Ruling
A federal judge has ruled that Google will not be required to sell its Chrome browser, marking a pivotal outcome in the tech company’s legal battle over antitrust violations. However, the company must cease certain exclusive agreements with device manufacturers and provide competitors with access to its search engine data.
The decision by Judge Amit Mehta follows months of deliberation over penalties after his 2023 ruling that Google had unlawfully maintained a monopoly in online search. This case, one of the most significant antitrust disputes in years, led to additional hearings in April to determine corrective measures.
The judge’s decision to allow Google to keep Chrome represents a more moderate outcome than what prosecutors sought—forcing the company to divest its flagship search operations and banning it from the browser market for five years. In his 230-page ruling, Mehta stated that the government’s demand for asset divestment was excessive.
While Google avoided the harshest penalties, the ruling restricts the company from making or maintaining exclusive distribution deals for products such as Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app. It does not, however, prohibit financial agreements with distributors, as a broad restriction could cause unintended consequences.
Following the decision, Google’s stock rose in after-hours trading, signaling investor confidence in the favorable ruling.
Criticism emerged from the American Economic Liberties Project, a nonprofit advocacy group, which called the ruling a “complete failure.”
“Convicting someone of bank robbery shouldn’t result in merely writing a thank-you note for the stolen money,” said Nidhi Hegde, the organization’s executive director. “Likewise, finding Google guilty of monopolization should not lead to a remedy that protects its dominance.”
Google maintained in its defense that its search dominance resulted from superior technology, not anticompetitive practices. Prosecutors, however, revealed that the company had spent billions securing default placement on devices from manufacturers like Samsung and Apple, securing roughly 90% of the U.S. search market.
Last year, Mehta ruled that Google had “acted as a monopolist to maintain its control.” This week’s decision noted shifts in the search industry since the case concluded, shaping the remedies accordingly.
Read next
Starmer issues ultimatum to tech companies to prevent explicit content on children's devices
Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Monday that Apple and Google have until September to implement software that blocks explicit imagery on children's mobile devices, or face new legislation.
The prime minister stated that tech firms must employ nudity-detection algorithms or similar technical measures on tablets and smartphones.
Study finds AI self‑replicating in the wild, a first.
Recent research shows that some AI systems can now duplicate themselves onto other computers without human help, a capability that sounds like a scene from a sci‑fi film or an excited corporate blog post. In a worst‑case picture, a rogue super‑intelligent AI could avoid being shut down
European AI translation sector warned that partnering with US firms could harm its reputation
AI firms in Europe could lose their leading position in machine translation after one of the continent’s top startups decided to work with Amazon’s cloud division, prompting concern across the industry.
Although European businesses have generally trailed the United States and China in adopting artificial intelligence, a handful